Time to buy this as your monitor, Erick: http://www.gizmag.com/go/6704/
:) Dawid On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Erick Erickson <[email protected]> wrote: > Ahem! Are we talking "over 40 fonts" here? It's a sad fact that I've > been noticing > over the last few years that the screen is getting harder to read... Living > long > enough to have that problem beats the alternative though... > > Erick > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Walter Underwood <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Feb 1, 2012, at 4:14 AM, Doron Cohen wrote: >> >> the text I see (tried 3 browsers) is a bit Gray (or faded), and I rather >> read a page with more contrast between the text and the background, more >> clear to my eyes this way, but this is just my personal preference, it seems >> others do not feel that way, so I'm okay with this. Hopefully this is more >> clear now? >> >> >> I agree. The body text is tiny and low contrast. Poor accessibility for >> anyone with low vision, including normal aging. >> >> Compare to the current site, which isn't large body text by any measure, but >> is bigger and full-contrast. >> >> Personally, I'd go with a serif font, but that is mostly preference. >> Letterforms are more differentiated with serifs, so it is just less work to >> read. >> >> wunder >> -- >> Walter Underwood >> [email protected] >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
