On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Steven A Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: > > Agreed. And also besides plus additionally, Lucene/Solr has way more Ant > hackers than Maven hackers. >
Believe it or not (you probably won't!) I seriously considered maven when looking at how to address the jar dependency issue. Everyone knows about my personal opinion on it, but for this issue, I'm trying to only look at the least-invasive/least-risk change that solves the problem. As much as I hate to say it, I initially thought maven was the only good alternative, but I took a moment to look at the documentation on the ivy site and it seems like a nice solution for our needs: i guess i'm hoping we can have a tiny initial non-invasive prototype patch that starts attacking the problem iteratively (yeah that means initially we still have the crazy xerces situation in lib/ until we figure out some solution for that, etc). -- lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
