+1 to test out Ivy, been thinking about it before as well -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
On 27. mars 2012, at 22:59, Robert Muir wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Steven A Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Agreed. And also besides plus additionally, Lucene/Solr has way more Ant >> hackers than Maven hackers. >> > > Believe it or not (you probably won't!) I seriously considered maven > when looking at how to address the jar dependency issue. Everyone > knows about my personal opinion on it, but for this issue, I'm trying > to only look at the least-invasive/least-risk change that solves the > problem. > > As much as I hate to say it, I initially thought maven was the only > good alternative, but I took a moment to look at the documentation on > the ivy site and it seems like a nice solution for our needs: i guess > i'm hoping we can have a tiny initial non-invasive prototype patch > that starts attacking the problem iteratively (yeah that means > initially we still have the crazy xerces situation in lib/ until we > figure out some solution for that, etc). > > -- > lucidimagination.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
