[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13258164#comment-13258164
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-4003:
---------------------------------------
I like this idea, too.
I would like to move this rewrite method (a little bit refactored, using
FixedBitSet instead OpenBitSet) to core, factor out the inner Filter impl to be
something like MTQWrapperFilter (maybe include the code in MTQWrapperFilter and
only set a boolean in ctor). The rewrite mode would then be similar to
FilterRewrite, just with another boolean.
We can remove FieldCacheRangeFilter.newStringRange() [or at least rewrite it to
use this rewrite method], which would be elegant, too. FieldCacheTermsFilter
and also the TermsFilter in contrib can go away and we should instead use the
sorted terms automaton (I always forget the name, Dawid, sorry) as a new
AtomatonQuery subclass.
> FieldCacheRewriteMethod.java is in tests
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4003
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4003
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: selckin
>
> I believe FieldCacheRewriteMethod was accidentally moved to the wrong place
> in r1158697 and should be src/main and not in src/test.
> Or is it something that you don't want people to use?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
