[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13259251#comment-13259251
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4004:
-------------------------------------
Usually yes, however at this stage we just released 3.6 (intended to be the
last minor release in the 3.x series).
So currently we have not yet cut a branch_4x for stable 4.0 and are only
working on trunk.
(separately, we also have
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_3_6/ open for
bugfixes, to backport any nasty bugs for 3.6.1, 3.6.2, etc: basically 3.x is
intended to be in maintenance mode like 2.9.x was)
> Add syntax for DisjunctionMaxQuery to the Query Parser
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4004
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4004
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/queryparser
> Affects Versions: 3.6
> Reporter: Benson Margulies
> Attachments: LUCENE-4004.patch, LUCENE-4004.patch
>
>
> I've come up with a use for DisjunctionMaxQuery, but not the dismax parser. I
> note that the toString() method on that item proposes a syntax with vertical
> bars. Is there any sympathy for a patch that added this to the standard
> parser, or some other syntax?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
