[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13259302#comment-13259302
]
Benson Margulies edited comment on LUCENE-4004 at 4/22/12 11:41 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4012 for an alternative
to adding syntax to any of the existing end-user-facing parsers. I think it
makes more sense, myself, but if others see value in continuing the line in
here I'm game.
was (Author: bmargulies):
Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4012 for an
alternative to adding syntax to any of the existing parsers. I think it makes
more sense, myself, but if others see value in continuing the line in here I'm
game.
> Add syntax for DisjunctionMaxQuery to the Query Parser
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4004
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4004
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/queryparser
> Affects Versions: 3.6
> Reporter: Benson Margulies
> Assignee: Robert Muir
> Attachments: LUCENE-4004.patch, LUCENE-4004.patch
>
>
> I've come up with a use for DisjunctionMaxQuery, but not the dismax parser. I
> note that the toString() method on that item proposes a syntax with vertical
> bars. Is there any sympathy for a patch that added this to the standard
> parser, or some other syntax?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
