[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13291797#comment-13291797
 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4101:
-------------------------------------

Thinking about this issue a bit, I think its bad if you have to use 
Field/FieldType api just to store a field.
So I agree this should be fixed.

Separately we should also make it easy to have a stored-only (not indexed) 
field. 

I felt like both of these things were easy with the old document API.

{quote}
A third option is to add boolean isStored to each of XXXFields? So, it's not 
stored by default, but then you can do:
{quote}

I don't like that we are making our apis hard to use just because java doesn't 
have named parameter passing or something.
I think the old API was great here: it had an enum for Stored so it was totally 
obvious from your code if it was stored or not,
or indexed or not.

I think if we dont like booleans for this silly reason, then we should just use 
an enum like the old API!

Extra Stored* classes for each field are just overwhelming.

{quote}
I can't see a situation where having to add the same field twice with different 
flags is good from a usability standpoint.
{quote}

We can never force that. People who are experts or committers are free to add 
the field twice if 
they want to (nothing stops them), but I don't want to see this forced in our 
APIs, its too difficult.

                
> Remove XXXField.TYPE_STORED
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4101
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4101
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 4.0, 5.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-4101.patch, LUCENE-4101.patch
>
>
> Spinoff from LUCENE-3312.
> For 4.0 I think we should simplify the sugar field APIs by requiring
> that you add a StoredField if you want to store the field.  Expert users
> can still make a custom FieldType that both stores and indexes...

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to