[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-4101:
---------------------------------------
Attachment: LUCENE-4101.patch
bq. I think if we dont like booleans for this silly reason, then we should just
use an enum like the old API!
OK, I'm attaching a new patch, using a Store.YES/NO enum, passed to TextField
and StringField. I also renamed TYPE_UNSTORED -> TYPE to make it clear that's
the default type.
If nobody disagrees w/ this approach ... I'll add the Store enum to the numeric
fields as well, then fix all tests to use it instead of XXXField.TYPE_STORED.
> Remove XXXField.TYPE_STORED
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4101
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4101
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 4.0, 5.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-4101.patch, LUCENE-4101.patch, LUCENE-4101.patch
>
>
> Spinoff from LUCENE-3312.
> For 4.0 I think we should simplify the sugar field APIs by requiring
> that you add a StoredField if you want to store the field. Expert users
> can still make a custom FieldType that both stores and indexes...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
