[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13293242#comment-13293242 ]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4120: ------------------------------------- Hmm, i forgot, Lucene40's docvalues supports packed ints. But, we don't test this well: LUCENE-4085 I'll see if i can do something to improve this: but we should decide if we want to just get this issue in before freezing the index format (releasing 4.0 alpha), or adding it at a later time and adding backwards compatibility. > FST should use packed integer arrays > ------------------------------------ > > Key: LUCENE-4120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4120 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core/FSTs > Reporter: Adrien Grand > Assignee: Adrien Grand > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-4120.patch, LUCENE-4120.patch > > > There are some places where an int[] could be advantageously replaced with a > packed integer array. > I am thinking (at least) of: > * FST.nodeAddress (GrowableWriter) > * FST.inCounts (GrowableWriter) > * FST.nodeRefToAddress (read-only Reader) > The serialization/deserialization methods should be modified too in order to > take advantage of PackedInts.get{Reader,Writer}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org