[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13293812#comment-13293812 ]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4120: ------------------------------------- bq. I think that's fine; you can't change an FST once it's built (not yet anyway...). Yeah, it'd be hard with the packed format. I once thought it'd be interesting to see incremental fst construction based on merging (much like it's done with inverted indexes). Delete would still be difficult (or impossible) but additions should be relatively easy to merge. > FST should use packed integer arrays > ------------------------------------ > > Key: LUCENE-4120 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4120 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core/FSTs > Reporter: Adrien Grand > Assignee: Adrien Grand > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-4120.patch, LUCENE-4120.patch > > > There are some places where an int[] could be advantageously replaced with a > packed integer array. > I am thinking (at least) of: > * FST.nodeAddress (GrowableWriter) > * FST.inCounts (GrowableWriter) > * FST.nodeRefToAddress (read-only Reader) > The serialization/deserialization methods should be modified too in order to > take advantage of PackedInts.get{Reader,Writer}. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org