You mean 4167?
----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen <http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [email protected] From: Chris Male [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 1:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Lucene 3.6.1 release starting this week Ah I want to do https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-416, I'll wrap it up now. On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: Hi, I wanted to kick-off the release process for Lucene 3.6.1 this week and would also be the RM. If you have any backports to be merged to 3.6 branch please do it today. If there are any urgent bugs that need to be fixed in 3.6.1 speak up, this will likely be the last 3.x release unless there are heavy bugs or security issues. I have one backport that might also be good in 3.6.1, it is already tested heavily on 4.0 and 5.0 branches, so I see no problems. It improves performance on MMapDirectory when you have lots of concurrency on opening TermEnums/DocsEnums because it removes the sync bottleneck in MMapIndexInput.clone(). Anything against a backport? See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4163 Uwe ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] -- Chris Male | Software Developer | DutchWorks | www.dutchworks.nl
