err sorry, I meant 4165. I've committed the fix to 3x now. On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote:
> You mean 4167?**** > > ** ** > > -----**** > > Uwe Schindler**** > > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen**** > > http://www.thetaphi.de**** > > eMail: [email protected]**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Chris Male [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Monday, July 16, 2012 1:45 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: Lucene 3.6.1 release starting this week**** > > ** ** > > Ah I want to do https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-416, I'll > wrap it up now.**** > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote:** > ** > > Hi, > > I wanted to kick-off the release process for Lucene 3.6.1 this week and > would also be the RM. If you have any backports to be merged to 3.6 branch > please do it today. If there are any urgent bugs that need to be fixed in > 3.6.1 speak up, this will likely be the last 3.x release unless there are > heavy bugs or security issues. > > I have one backport that might also be good in 3.6.1, it is already tested > heavily on 4.0 and 5.0 branches, so I see no problems. It improves > performance on MMapDirectory when you have lots of concurrency on opening > TermEnums/DocsEnums because it removes the sync bottleneck in > MMapIndexInput.clone(). Anything against a backport? See > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4163 > > Uwe > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]**** > > > > **** > > ** ** > > -- > Chris Male | Software Developer | DutchWorks | www.dutchworks.nl**** > -- Chris Male | Software Developer | DutchWorks | www.dutchworks.nl
