[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13421138#comment-13421138
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-4044:
------------------------------------
bq. Chris: I'm gonna scratch out a branch here and see if we can flesh this out.
Thanks for coming back to this Robert! I was just thinking about returning to
this issue.
{quote}
At least I think we should give it a try as it would be pretty much a win for
everyone
to simplify this syntax and make these analysis modules real plugins (I'm
frustrated with
things like SOLR-3623 / the hassle people have to go thru to use some of the
lucene analyzers)
{quote}
Absolutely. I'm a huge fan of the simplified syntax. Every consumer of
Lucene, Solr or not, would benefit from being able to easily retrieve these
Factories.
Looking over the patch I see what you meant and I really like it. I wonder
whether we should integrate newInstance into NamedSPILoader and add getName()
to the Factorys? The getName impl can then do the classname clipping like
currently done in the patch.
> Add NamedSPILoader support to TokenizerFactory, TokenFilterFactory and
> CharFilterFactory
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4044
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4044
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: modules/analysis
> Reporter: Chris Male
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-4044.patch
>
>
> In LUCENE-2510 I want to move all the analysis factories out of Solr and into
> the directories with what they create. This is going to hamper Solr's
> existing strategy for supporting {{solr.*}} package names, where it replaces
> {{solr}} with various pre-defined package names. One way to tackle this is
> to use NamedSPILoader so we simply look up {{StandardTokenizerFactory}} for
> example, and find it wherever it is, as long as it is defined as a service.
> This is similar to how we support Codecs currently.
> As noted by Robert in LUCENE-2510, this would also have the benefit of
> meaning configurations could be less verbose, would aid in fully decoupling
> the analysis module from Solr, and make the analysis factories easier to
> interact with.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
