+1 Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > FieldsEnum seems kinda awkward, can we just have something like > Iterable<String> on Fields? > > so the consuming code i think would be easier. > > for (String field : fields) { > Terms terms = fields.terms(field); > ... > } > > I don't like that there are two ways to get the terms for a field > today, so there is duplicate logic or crazy > stuff to handle this Fields.terms(String) versus FieldsEnum.terms() > > -- > lucidimagination.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
