On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I see your point, second option sounds much better. > We could perhaps make a shortly due roadmap like: > - fix whatever you want by date x (2/3/4 weeks) > - code freeze for 1/2 weeks > - release > - celebrate :-)
Personally I would prefer we don't do the first part. Adding some arbitrary length of time like this to fix whatever you want invites a "code-shoving" period where people are encouraged to rush things in to get them by XYZ date. This can basically cause a huge destabilization of the codebase, and its totally unnecessary. I would prefer we wind down now and do bugs, docs, tests, and blockers. I don't like official code freezes either, I feel like we can just work together on this and do what makes sense. -- lucidworks.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
