2012/9/14 Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Tommaso Teofili > <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I see your point, second option sounds much better. > > We could perhaps make a shortly due roadmap like: > > - fix whatever you want by date x (2/3/4 weeks) > > - code freeze for 1/2 weeks > > - release > > - celebrate :-) > > Personally I would prefer we don't do the first part. Adding some > arbitrary length of time like this to fix whatever you want invites a > "code-shoving" period where people are encouraged to rush things in to > get them by XYZ date. > > This can basically cause a huge destabilization of the codebase, and > its totally unnecessary. >
good point. > > I would prefer we wind down now and do bugs, docs, tests, and > blockers. I don't like official code freezes either, I feel like we > can just work together on this and do what makes sense. > that's fine with me, let's do that ;) Tommaso > > -- > lucidworks.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
