On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Mark Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > I get value from this test - if it was disabled, I'd probably re-enable it. > would be great if it didn't fail so much, but the type of fail tells me > something.
That means the assert in question isnt important at all. I'll remove it. Again my problem is the idea that having a failing build is "ok" because certain types of failures "don't matter". If they dont matter they should be removed. It causes a ton of noise when people are lazy about tests in this way, and it wastes a ton of peoples time. R Remember every time one of these tests fails it sends an email, that I must read (we don't yet have a way to put in the subject header its a SOLR test fail versus a LUCENE one, or i'd filter the solr ones and not be complaining as much). -- lucidworks.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
