Doesn't matter. I'm still waiting for you to put my code back. On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree. The original commit, as a "silencer" for Jenkins [as I understood > it, so I reverted it after fixing the problem] was too fast and without > discussion. > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: [email protected] > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 12:14 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1421598 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/test- >> framework/src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/Te >> stRuleSetupAndRestoreClassEnv.java >> >> >> : I think if an issue is contentious, we should open a JIRA issue and come >> : to consensus before making another change for that issue to the >> : codebase. >> >> Proposal: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4630 >> >> >> -Hoss >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional >> commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
