On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com> wrote:
> bq. How can it not be a true error?!
>
> If you @link to a package-private class in a javadoc, it DOES NOT create a
> link, but rather just writes the plain class's name. In fact, the result of
> {@link PackagePrivateClass} is the same as {@code PackagePrivateClass}. At
> least, I ran 'ant javadocs' and viewed the HTML, and the result was like the
> latter.Dude: if it didn't create a link, you wouldnt have gotten a broken links failures. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
