I guess you didn't read past that comment :). I wrote that I don't know how
documentation-lint works and whether it broke on the method signature or
the {@link}.
Shai
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > bq. How can it not be a true error?!
> >
> > If you @link to a package-private class in a javadoc, it DOES NOT create
> a
> > link, but rather just writes the plain class's name. In fact, the result
> of
> > {@link PackagePrivateClass} is the same as {@code PackagePrivateClass}.
> At
> > least, I ran 'ant javadocs' and viewed the HTML, and the result was like
> the
> > latter.
>
> Dude: if it didn't create a link, you wouldnt have gotten a broken
> links failures.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
