[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13548765#comment-13548765
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-4670:
--------------------------------------
bq. i think this looks better?
Yes it does!
bq. I can go either way on whether or not the finish() methods should be
abstract though (versus having a no-op impl).
A no-op impl would make the change backward compatible?
> Add TermVectorsWriter.finish{Doc,Field,Term} to make development of new
> formats easier
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4670
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4670
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Assignee: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.1
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-4670.patch, LUCENE-4670.patch
>
>
> This is especially useful to LUCENE-4599 where actions have to be taken after
> a doc/field/term has been added.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
