Supporting both just compounds our problems and doesn't go very far towards solving any.
The only place the webapp will end up still making sense after a bit of time is in non solrcloud mode. The improvements it will bring will make it a dumb choice if you use SolrCloud. We already have enough baggage holding up SolrCloud because of supporting the std mode - adding to the list only makes my life even harder. We need to reduce the number of configurations we ship, not multiply them. I believe *very* strongly. We must start to focus the beam, there is already to much diffraction. - Mark On May 4, 2013, at 2:09 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> wrote: > Why not just support both? It really isn't all that hard. While I agree w/ > Robert and Mark that it's time to consider alternatives, I also don't think > it is all that hard to support both from a user's perspective. We could have > a Netty(or other) version and a WAR version and I don't think it is that big > of a deal to maintain. After all, we already have the component pieces as > JARs, just bundle them up differently for Netty, etc. > > -Grant > > > On May 3, 2013, at 8:09 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > >> But I'm really curious, what is the problem with Solr inside a >> container? Which problem is this solving? I feel like I missed some >> important thread.... which is highly possible. :) >> >> Thanks, >> Otis >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> # rm -rf tomcat >>> # gzip -dc solr.tgz | tar -xvf - >>> # cd solr/example >>> # java -jar start.jar >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Steve Molloy <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> So, if ever this passes, what would be the upgrade path for all the >>>> deployments using Solr as a webapp inside tomcat or other container? >>>> ________________________________________ >>>> From: Michael McCandless [[email protected]] >>>> Sent: May 3, 2013 12:09 PM >>>> To: Lucene/Solr dev >>>> Subject: Re: VOTE: solr no longer webapp >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> I think solr should no longer be a war file but a search app. I don't >>>>> care >>>>> how it accomplishes this: jetty, netty, its all up to us. >>>>> >>>>> Let me know your ideas: I think its a necessary step to move solr >>>>> forwards. >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Mike McCandless >>>> >>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > -------------------------------------------- > Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers > http://www.lucidworks.com > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
