[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13681810#comment-13681810
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-4872:
-----------------------------------
{quote}
then there was some confusion about Tokenizer.close(), and a ref to LUCENE-2145
(which i suspect isn't particularly applicable since it's pretty old and the
APIs have evolved heavily since then)
{quote}
No, I think this is actually the core issue. Tokenizer.close() doesnt mean...
close the Tokenizer. it means close the reader. This is super-confusing and it
means Benson has no way to release resources. I really think we should fix
this, not add any hacks to solr.
> Allow analyzers to be SolrCoreAware
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-4872
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4872
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 4.3
> Reporter: Benson Margulies
>
> I have a need, in an analyzer, to have a shared cache that is cleaned up when
> the core is torn down. Solr rejects analyzer components that are
> SolrCoreAware. Is there some really good reason for this? What harm would
> come from allowing one to register a CloseHook?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
