[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13717827#comment-13717827 ]
Feihong Huang commented on SOLR-5057: ------------------------------------- hi, erickson. I think that way can re-use the filterCache when the fq clauses were ordered differently. I am a new comer in learning solr. If there is some points that i am not considering sufficiently, i apologize for this. > queryResultCache should not related with the order of fq's list > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-5057 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5057 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: search > Affects Versions: 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 > Reporter: Feihong Huang > Assignee: Erick Erickson > Priority: Minor > Attachments: SOLR-5057.patch, SOLR-5057.patch > > Original Estimate: 48h > Remaining Estimate: 48h > > There are two case query with the same meaning below. But the case2 can't use > the queryResultCache when case1 is executed. > case1: q=*:*&fq=field1:value1&fq=field2:value2 > case2: q=*:*&fq=field2:value2&fq=field1:value1 > I think queryResultCache should not be related with the order of fq's list. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org