I don't think it's an issue - if it helps users to conclude how to get it I think it's actually an improvement!
simon On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: > As part of a recent commit I cleaned up the comments surrounding the > clustering extension in the Solr example. As part of this I added > comments concerning configuration of clustering algorithms in the > Carrot2 framework, but also a helpers that refer to our commercial > clustering algorithm Lingo3G. They seem harmless to me, as in: > > <!-- Class name of a clustering algorithm compatible with the Carrot2 > framework. > > Currently available open source algorithms are: > * org.carrot2.clustering.lingo.LingoClusteringAlgorithm > * org.carrot2.clustering.stc.STCClusteringAlgorithm > * org.carrot2.clustering.kmeans.BisectingKMeansClusteringAlgorithm > > See http://project.carrot2.org/algorithms.html for more > information. > > A commercial algorithm Lingo3G (needs to be installed > separately) is defined as: > * com.carrotsearch.lingo3g.Lingo3GClusteringAlgorithm > --> > <str > name="carrot.algorithm">org.carrot2.clustering.lingo.LingoClusteringAlgorithm</str> > > I admit the reason I included these was not to promote the algorithm, > but to limit the number of support requests we get where users are not > sure how to modify Solr configuration to use Lingo3G out of the box... > > Is this something that is ok or does it bother anybody? If so, let me > know and I will remove those two references from comments. > > Dawid > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
