Ok, thanks. Didn't know about it. Dawid
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > It was intended as a requirement: We had bugs before where newer ant > versions would not work correctly with the build. They may still exist > (unsure). > > The simplest thing to do was to just support one single version of ant > and error out otherwise, so that its completely clear. > > Otherwise we have to figure out a way to test all these N versions we > support (else people will bring it up in release votes and users will > open bug reports why XYZ doesnt build correctly on N+4 crazy version > of ant). > > So I don't think we should remove this check (that you have the ant > version we support) without infrastructure in place to test the > 'additional ant versions', at least the major ones! Otherwise I really > see this falling on the release manager to deal with in the future to > verify and I do not think that is ok. > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Dawid Weiss > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think the bar was "at least" 1.8+ so perhaps it's a bug in the >> condition, not a requirement. >> >> Dawid >> >> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Mark Miller <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Anyone object to letting Ant 1.9X build releases? Is there a particular >>> reason that the smoke tester looks for 1.8X specifically and does not allow >>> later? >>> >>> I'd prefer not to downgrade if I don't have to, but I will. >>> >>> -- >>> - Mark >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
