[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13829937#comment-13829937
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5329:
--------------------------------------------
Thanks Areek, patch looks great! I'll commit soon...
That's a good question: I don't think we have a MultiValueSource.
> Make DocumentDictionary and co more lenient to dirty documents
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5329
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5329
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/search
> Reporter: Areek Zillur
> Attachments: LUCENE-5329.patch, LUCENE-5329.patch, LUCENE-5329.patch,
> LUCENE-5329.patch, LUCENE-5329.patch
>
>
> Currently DocumentDictionary errors out whenever any document does not have
> value for any relevant stored fields. It would be nice to make it lenient and
> instead ignore the invalid documents.
> Another "issue" with the DocumentDictionary is that it only allows string
> fields as suggestions and binary fields as payloads. When exposing these
> dictionaries to solr (via https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5378),
> it is inconvenient for the user to ensure that a suggestion field is a string
> field and a payload field is a binary field. It would be nice to have the
> dictionary "just work" whenever a string/binary field is passed to
> suggestion/payload field. The patch provides one solution to this problem (by
> accepting string or binary values), though it would be great if there are any
> other solution to this, without making the DocumentDictionary "too flexible"
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
