Hmmm. I did switch my order by clause to affected version part way through, so not all of the ones I closed would be version 1/2. Does it make sense to put _some_ of them back for version XXX?
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Erick Erickson <[email protected]>wrote: > s/"do anything"/"close them"/ > > > On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Erick Erickson > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> For Lucene 1.x? Who's going to do anything except ignore them forever? >> Anything with patches is so out of date that I'd expect it to be totally >> irrelevant. >> >> I can re-open them but it seems unnecessary to leave them hanging around, >> it offends my sense of neatness. Hmmm, maybe that's insufficient reason for >> me to do anything... >> >> >> On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Erick, why did you mark a ton of LUCENE issues "won't fix"? >>> >>> Just because they've been open for a while? >>> >>> Can you please put these back? Closing bugs like >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-993, just because nobody >>> has fixed them yet, i dont think that helps anything. >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >
