Well for example LUCENE-993 is valid, just nobody fixed it yet. I dont think we should close such bugs as "won't fix" just because the issues have been open for a long time. closing as "won't fix" because the issue no longer makes any sense at all is something different.
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Erick Erickson <[email protected]> wrote: > For Lucene 1.x? Who's going to do anything except ignore them forever? > Anything with patches is so out of date that I'd expect it to be totally > irrelevant. > > I can re-open them but it seems unnecessary to leave them hanging around, it > offends my sense of neatness. Hmmm, maybe that's insufficient reason for me > to do anything... > > > On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Erick, why did you mark a ton of LUCENE issues "won't fix"? >> >> Just because they've been open for a while? >> >> Can you please put these back? Closing bugs like >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-993, just because nobody >> has fixed them yet, i dont think that helps anything. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
