[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13852852#comment-13852852
]
Michal Hlavac commented on LUCENE-5356:
---------------------------------------
Ok, I'll try to change what you say.
One of base motivation was to remove morfologik-polish from dependecies. It's
not backwards compatible but it's more generic. I don't need polish dictionary
when I am using e.g. english dictionary.
> more generic lucene-morfologik integration
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5356
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5356
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: modules/analysis
> Affects Versions: 4.6
> Reporter: Michal Hlavac
> Assignee: Dawid Weiss
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: newbie, patch
> Fix For: 5.0, 4.7
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-5356.patch, LUCENE-5356.patch
>
>
> I have little proposal for morfologik lucene module. Current module is
> tightly coupled with polish DICTIONARY enumeration.
> But other people (like me) can build own dictionaries to FSA and use it with
> lucene.
> You can find proposal in attachment and also example usage in analyzer
> (SlovakLemmaAnalyzer).
> It uses dictionary property as String resource from classpath, not
> enumeration.
> One change is, that dictionary variable must be set in MofologikFilterFactory
> (no default value).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
