Michael, what is this PCL branch? I don't recall you ever brought it up here?
-- Itamar Syn-Hershko http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> Freelance Developer & Consultant Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:43 AM, michael herndon < mhern...@michaelherndon.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > Thank you to you and others for your efforts on this! > > If Lucene.Net had a formal contribution process, its been lost over time. > I've recently written one up that is specific to only to the PCL / VNext > Branch. https://github.com/apache/lucene.net/tree/pcl. I'll just basically > follow in the footsteps of that. > > The Apache Foundation wants to ensure that committers, people who has > read/write access to the project, verifies all the patches are applied > under the apache 2.0 license and is granted to the foundation. So in order > to meet that expectation, please do the following. > > I've created a jira ticket: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-545. > > - Create one more commit from your git repo. > - Change the acknowledgement.txt file to list all the people who > worked on this and that the code changes is submitted under the > apache 2.0 > license. > - Then commit the change with LUCENENET-545 in the message. > - Send a pull request to the lucene.net repo on github. > - Have the all contributors send a short reply to this e-mail to verify > they all agree to submit the code changes under the apache 2.0 license > as > stated in the commit. > > > When that is done, I'll update the ticket to reference the pull request and > e-mails. Then a merge can be started to pull in order to pull in the new > changes. > > One of the committers will then merge code into the repo. I wouldn't be > surprise if there is chatter on this thread or another on how committers > want specifics of the merge to be handled, however, getting the > aknowledgements should get us most of the way there. > > In mean time, if you or others all are going to continue to work on this as > time permits, consider becoming a project committer. Most apache projects > want a ticket per patch/pull-request submitted and that may become > cumbersome over time. > > -Michael > > > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:01 PM, David Wan <t-de...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We have been working on a port of Lucene 4.8.0 for the past few months > and > > was wondering what the process was for contributing back into the main > > Lucene.net project. It is currently a rough work in progress and we have > > about 1518 unit tests passing out of 1971. Our progress has slowed down > in > > the past few weeks and we really hope to get some help from the community > > to help us fix all the issues and push out this release. > > > > You can check out our latest source at: > > https://github.com/russelltrupiano/lucene.net-1 > > > > Any help would be greatly appreciated! > > > > Thanks, > > David > > >
