dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Fix SegmentInfos replace doesn't update userData [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix SegmentInfos replace doesn't update userData [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix SegmentInfos replace doesn't update userData [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] SegmentInfos replace doesn't update userData [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] SegmentInfos replace doesn't update userData [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] ShingleFilter produces invalid queries [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ShingleFilter produces invalid queries [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ShingleFilter produces invalid queries [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] FuzzyQuery produces a wrong result when prefix is equal to the term length [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FuzzyQuery produces a wrong result when prefix is equal to the term length [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FuzzyQuery produces a wrong result when prefix is equal to the term length [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FuzzyQuery produces a wrong result when prefix is equal to the term length [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FuzzyQuery produces a wrong result when prefix is equal to the term length [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] FuzzyQuery produces a wrong result when prefix is equal to the term length [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/issues/943 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/issues/943 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/issues/943 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] ShingleFilter produces invalid queries [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] ShingleFilter produces invalid queries [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] ShingleFilter produces invalid queries [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix the wrong check of FuzzyQuery [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix the wrong check of FuzzyQuery [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] FuzzyQuery produces a wrong result when prefix is equal to the term length [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FuzzyQuery produces a wrong result when prefix is equal to the term length [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FuzzyQuery produces a wrong result when prefix is equal to the term length [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] FuzzyQuery produces a wrong result when prefix is equal to the term length [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] BUG: Fix for DocumentsWriter concurrency (fixes #935, closes #886) [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BUG: Fix for DocumentsWriter concurrency (fixes #935, closes #886) [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BUG: Fix for DocumentsWriter concurrency (fixes #935, closes #886) [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BUG: Fix for DocumentsWriter concurrency (fixes #935, closes #886) [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BUG: Fix for DocumentsWriter concurrency (fixes #935, closes #886) [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BUG: Fix for DocumentsWriter concurrency (fixes #935, closes #886) [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BUG: Fix for DocumentsWriter concurrency (fixes #935, closes #886) [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BUG: Fix for DocumentsWriter concurrency (fixes #935, closes #886) [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BUG: Fix for DocumentsWriter concurrency (fixes #935, closes #886) [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BUG: Fix for DocumentsWriter concurrency (fixes #935, closes #886) [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BUG: Fix for DocumentsWriter concurrency (fixes #935, closes #886) [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BUG: Fix for DocumentsWriter concurrency (fixes #935, closes #886) [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BUG: Fix for DocumentsWriter concurrency (fixes #935, closes #886) [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BUG: Fix for DocumentsWriter concurrency (fixes #935, closes #886) [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BUG: Fix for DocumentsWriter concurrency (fixes #935, closes #886) [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BUG: Fix for DocumentsWriter concurrency (fixes #935, closes #886) [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BUG: Fix for DocumentsWriter concurrency (fixes #935, closes #886) [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Lucene.Net.Util.Constants: Updated to detect .NET Framework 4.8.1 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Lucene.Net.Util.Constants: Updated to detect .NET Framework 4.8.1 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• Community over Code EU 2024: The countdown has started! Ryan Skraba
• [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore fsync behavior in FSDirectory via P/Invoke, #933 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Lucene.Net.Util.SystemConsole throws not supported exception in .NET MAUI app running on android/iOS [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene.Net.Util.SystemConsole throws not supported exception in .NET MAUI app running on android/iOS [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Poor multi-threaded indexing performance [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Set license expression on nuget [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Set license expression on nuget [lucenenet] via GitHub
• Community over Code EU 2024: Start planning your trip! Ryan Skraba
• Participate in the ASF 25th Anniversary Campaign Brian Proffitt
• Community Over Code NA 2024 Travel Assistance Applications now open! Gavin McDonald
• [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 12000x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance decrease 30x when running on .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Fix calls to Exception.StackTrace [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix calls to Exception.StackTrace [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix calls to Exception.StackTrace [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix calls to Exception.StackTrace [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix calls to Exception.StackTrace [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix calls to Exception.StackTrace [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix calls to Exception.StackTrace [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] Remove unnecessary`[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.NoInlining)]` [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove unnecessary`[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.NoInlining)]` [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove unnecessary`[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.NoInlining)]` [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade tests and CLI to .NET 8, fix benchmark formatting issue [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] .Net 6 and 8 slower than .Net 472 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Target .NET 8 [lucenenet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Any plans for supporting .Net7.0 or .Net 8.0? [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] SWEEP: Reviewed usage of atomic numeric type methods [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SWEEP: Reviewed usage of atomic numeric type methods [lucenenet] via GitHub
• [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test review Core I-J [lucenenet] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages