Yes - so if Wyatt can sort this out for us in a configurable way I'm personally going to buy him beers
-- Itamar Syn-Hershko http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> Freelance Developer & Consultant Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Paul Irwin <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that would be a good idea for very useful logs - but in this case, > the logs only appear to be useful if you're diagnosing an issue. It would > be too verbose to log for every single CI test run (probably talking in the > MBs of logs just for this one test). > > > Paul Irwin > Lead Software Engineer > feature[23] > > Email: [email protected] > Cell: 863-698-9294 > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Better yet, how about: > > > > 1. Replacing all Console.WriteLine with logger.WriteLine - but set it up > so > > output does show up on TeamCity's output AND VisualStudio's Output > window? > > this way we can get far better logs on demand. > > > > 2. In the CI server, have the VERBOSE and DEBUG settings tunable for when > > we do want to run tests and get the logs for further inspections > > > > -- > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/> > > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Paul Irwin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I think I found the issue with the tests taking forever to run. > > > TestDoubleMockGraphTokenFilterRandom was running seemingly indefinitely > > -- > > > I don't actually think now that it would run indefinitely, I just > didn't > > > feel like waiting on it after a good number of minutes. > > > > > > I noticed a strange behavior when I was stepping through the test to > see > > > what was going on -- the console output would catch up every few times > > I'd > > > step over a statement, as if there were a background thread going on. > > > > > > I do think there is some background thread issue, but it isn't with the > > > Lucene.net code (as far as I can tell) -- it appears to be with NUnit > > > itself or perhaps the VS test framework. But since it happened on the > CI > > > server too, I'm leaning towards NUnit. > > > > > > What I actually think is happening is that the Console output is > handled > > > asynchronously in some background thread, and there's just *so much* > > > logging > > > happening in the LookaheadTokenFilter et al that when DEBUG evaluates > to > > > true and the Console.WriteLine calls stack up, it takes forever to get > > > through them all. Running the tests in Release mode (when the > > > Console.WriteLine is not called) or manually setting DEBUG and VERBOSE > to > > > evaluate to false even in Debug configuration, causes the test to pass > in > > > 15 seconds on my machine. > > > > > > Wyatt, can you try running the build and tests in Release mode and see > if > > > it runs better for you? We might also be able to get through this by > > > reducing the logging by commenting out the Console.WriteLine calls. > > > > > > > > > Paul Irwin > > > Lead Software Engineer > > > feature[23] > > > > > > Email: [email protected] > > > Cell: 863-698-9294 > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Please do. > > > > > > > > Send a ICLA to secretary@apache and send us a PR, I'll take care of > > > > merging > > > > it > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Wyatt Barnett < > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > So, after fighting a number of teething problems -- many of them > self > > > > > inflicted -- I've got a solid, repeatable test run that finishes in > > 38 > > > > > minutes or so on our hardware. > > > > > > > > > > I can certainly reprise this setup over on teamcity.codebetter.com > > > > without > > > > > much effort. We will need to merge some changes into things before > > > > > proceeding -- the current state of tests in the trunk will just > hang > > if > > > > we > > > > > tried to run them there. I'm guessing I'll need to sign a > > contributing > > > > > agreement here as I don't believe I filed one. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Wyatt Barnett < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds good, we'll be [Explicit()] with reason. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> Yes, but Explicit() will help us isolate those issues from other > > > real > > > > > bugs > > > > > >> we can concentrate on solving in parallel. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> -- > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko > > > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko < > https://twitter.com/synhershko> > > > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant > > > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Wyatt Barnett < > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > [Ignore()] is good too, I actually prefer a slightly nuanced > > > version > > > > > >> called > > > > > >> > [Explicit()] as that lets you still fire off the test from > > > resharper > > > > > or > > > > > >> > nunit gui. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > That said I proposed Assert.Fail() here because we can put the > > > > failure > > > > > >> > point at the *exact* point where the folks should start > > debugging > > > > this > > > > > >> from > > > > > >> > versus having them start a at a whole test or test fixture. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko < > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Don't forget to stick a reason to the Ignore property tho! > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > -- > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > > > > > >> > > http://code972.com | @synhershko < > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko> > > > > > >> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant > > > > > >> > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/ > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko < > > > > > >> [email protected] > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > Or just Skip (or Ignore, however that's called in NUnit) > :) > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > -- > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > > > > > >> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko < > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko> > > > > > >> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant > > > > > >> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action < > http://manning.com/synhershko/ > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Wyatt Barnett < > > > > > >> > [email protected] > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> 5 minutes sounds like a reasonable going in proposition. > > That > > > > > said > > > > > >> > > >> depending on how many of these there are there might well > > be > > > a > > > > > >> *lot* > > > > > >> > of > > > > > >> > > 5 > > > > > >> > > >> minute waits. > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> Would it help if I just stuck Assert.Fails() where I run > > into > > > > > these > > > > > >> > > loops > > > > > >> > > >> for the folks smarter than I to run down? > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko < > > > > > >> > [email protected] > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > 5 mins max for one test maybe? > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > To fix that infinite loop we need to revisit the > original > > > > Java > > > > > >> code, > > > > > >> > > >> most > > > > > >> > > >> > likely its porting of an iterator-style code that went > > > > wrong. I > > > > > >> hope > > > > > >> > > to > > > > > >> > > >> > have time to look at it next week, please anyone else > who > > > > feels > > > > > >> like > > > > > >> > > it > > > > > >> > > >> > beat me to it.. > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > -- > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > Itamar Syn-Hershko > > > > > >> > > >> > http://code972.com | @synhershko < > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > Freelance Developer & Consultant > > > > > >> > > >> > Author of RavenDB in Action < > > > http://manning.com/synhershko/> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Wyatt Barnett < > > > > > >> > > >> [email protected]> > > > > > >> > > >> > wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > So, after the 2nd day of watching the tests just > spin I > > > > > decided > > > > > >> > > that a > > > > > >> > > >> > > little visibility might make sense as something just > > was > > > > not > > > > > >> > adding > > > > > >> > > up > > > > > >> > > >> > -- I > > > > > >> > > >> > > expected some failing tests, and some long-running > > tests > > > > but > > > > > >> there > > > > > >> > > >> just > > > > > >> > > >> > > ain't enough data here to keep something running for > 8+ > > > > > hours. > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > Anyhow, I stood up VS and the debugger and started > > > looking > > > > > into > > > > > >> > > things > > > > > >> > > >> > and > > > > > >> > > >> > > I found that I was hitting at least one infiinte loop > > > > dealing > > > > > >> with > > > > > >> > > >> > > randomized values -- specifically at > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene.net/blob/master/src/Lucene.Net.TestFramework/Index/BasePostingsFormatTestCase.cs#L394 > > > > > >> > > >> > > ; > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > Anyhow, I'm not sure how to proceed here as if we > want > > > test > > > > > >> > > automation > > > > > >> > > >> > the > > > > > >> > > >> > > tests need to run through in a reasonable amount of > > time > > > > but > > > > > I > > > > > >> > don't > > > > > >> > > >> know > > > > > >> > > >> > > enough about the project to know what should run or > > not. > > > > One > > > > > >> > thought > > > > > >> > > >> > would > > > > > >> > > >> > > be to use nunit timeout attributes ( > > > > > >> > > >> > > http://www.nunit.org/index.php?p=timeout&r=2.5) to > > > > constrain > > > > > >> > > things. > > > > > >> > > >> If > > > > > >> > > >> > so > > > > > >> > > >> > > what is a reasonable timeout? > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > I'm quite open to other, non kludgy thoughts too . . > . > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Wyatt Barnett < > > > > > >> > > >> [email protected] > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > I looked over GitVersion -- looks like a great fit > > for > > > > this > > > > > >> > > project > > > > > >> > > >> > > though > > > > > >> > > >> > > > it will require a bit of forethought about > branching > > > > > >> strategies. > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > I'll take a run at getting it integrated once I get > > > > through > > > > > >> the > > > > > >> > > test > > > > > >> > > >> > > suite > > > > > >> > > >> > > > running successfully. > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Itamar > Syn-Hershko > > < > > > > > >> > > >> > [email protected] > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Inline > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko < > > > > > >> > https://twitter.com/synhershko > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action < > > > > > http://manning.com/synhershko/ > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Wyatt Barnett < > > > > > >> > > >> > [email protected] > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > Thanks. I registered at CodeBetter.com under > wwb. > > Is > > > > > there > > > > > >> > any > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > documentation on their TeamCity setup or someone > > > who I > > > > > can > > > > > >> > > reach > > > > > >> > > >> out > > > > > >> > > >> > > to > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > regarding questions about the build environment? > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> I'm asking around, will let you know > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > Thanks for the rundown -- things sound pretty > > > > > >> straightforward > > > > > >> > > and > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> doable. > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > One thing we'll need to think a bit a bout is > how > > do > > > > we > > > > > >> want > > > > > >> > to > > > > > >> > > >> > manage > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> the > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > git branching strategy to best integrate with > > > TeamCity > > > > > and > > > > > >> > best > > > > > >> > > >> > > automate > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > the release cycle. Doing things like constantly > > > > > building a > > > > > >> > > >> "trunk" > > > > > >> > > >> > and > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > releasing based on tags are very doable. > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Are you familiar with > > > > > >> > > https://github.com/ParticularLabs/GitVersion > > > > > >> > > >> ? > > > > > >> > > >> > > I'll > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> be interested in adopting this to our process. > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > I've grabbed the code, looks like things are > > pretty > > > > > clean > > > > > >> in > > > > > >> > > >> terms > > > > > >> > > >> > of > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> being > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > able to build and run cleanly. One question -- > I > > > > > started > > > > > >> > > running > > > > > >> > > >> > the > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> test > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > suite, it appears to execute about 80% > > successfully. > > > > I'm > > > > > >> > > >> presuming > > > > > >> > > >> > > this > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> is > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > because we are still porting 4.8.0 here and is > > > > expected > > > > > >> > > behavior. > > > > > >> > > >> > > Please > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > confirm. > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Yes, we still have some failing tests. The hope is > > to > > > > also > > > > > >> > > utilize > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> TeamCity's reports to measure the affects of > > internal > > > > > >> changes > > > > > >> > we > > > > > >> > > >> make > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> faster. > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > I'll take a few stabs at a build cycle over the > > next > > > > few > > > > > >> days > > > > > >> > > and > > > > > >> > > >> > see > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> what > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > I can shake out. > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks! > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Itamar > > > Syn-Hershko < > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> [email protected]> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Thanks Wyatt > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Can you please register at > > > > > >> http://teamcity.codebetter.com/ > > > > > >> > > and > > > > > >> > > >> > send > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> me > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > your > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > user name (privately if you prefer)? > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Please use the master branch of our Apache git > > > > git:// > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > git.apache.org/lucene.net.git - or the mirror > > at > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > https://github.com/apache/lucene.net (would > > > rather > > > > > you > > > > > >> use > > > > > >> > > the > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> original > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > one > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > to avoid delays) > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > The way I see it is this: > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Lucene.Net.TestFramework compiles and > > generates > > > a > > > > > >> nuget > > > > > >> > > >> package > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Lucene.Net.Core and Lucene.Net.Tests > compiles, > > > > > taking > > > > > >> > > >> dependency > > > > > >> > > >> > > on > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Lucene.Net.TestFramework > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Lucene.Net.Tests is run and if successful > > > versions > > > > > the > > > > > >> > > build > > > > > >> > > >> and > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > generates nuget on the local feed (we also > have > > a > > > > > MyGet > > > > > >> > > >> account to > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> work > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > with) > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Same process to all sub-projects: > > > > Lucene.Net.Queries > > > > > >> for > > > > > >> > > >> > example: > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Compile > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Compile Lucene.Net.Tests.Queries > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Run tests from Lucene.Net.Tests.Queries > > (take > > > > > >> > dependency > > > > > >> > > on > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Lucene.Net.TestFramework) > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Create nuget for Lucene.Net.Queries > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Every sub-project should be re-compiled and > > > tests > > > > > >> re-run > > > > > >> > if > > > > > >> > > >> the > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > projects > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > it depends on have changed (you can probably > > > > separate > > > > > >> the > > > > > >> > > >> cases by > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > defining > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > watch folders under src\) > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > We can then iterate from there. > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > I updated the README to explain the new > > structure > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene.net/blob/master/README.md#files > > > > > >> > > >> > - > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> let > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > me > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > know if you have any questions. > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > http://code972.com | @synhershko < > > > > > >> > > >> https://twitter.com/synhershko> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Author of RavenDB in Action < > > > > > >> > http://manning.com/synhershko/> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Wyatt > Barnett < > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> [email protected]> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > That would be great -- let me know what I > need > > > to > > > > do > > > > > >> to > > > > > >> > > help > > > > > >> > > >> > make > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> that > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > happen. > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > In the meantime I've got a teamcity server > to > > > work > > > > > >> with > > > > > >> > > here, > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> should I > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > be > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > looking at > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > https://github.com/synhershko/lucene.net/tree/Lucene.Net_4.8.0 > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > as the project layout. > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Also, what is envisioned for the output of > the > > > > build > > > > > >> > > >> pipeline? > > > > > >> > > >> > > Many > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > things > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > are within the art of the possible. > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Prescott > > > Nasser < > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > [email protected]> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > Would love the help setting this up - > Itamar > > > do > > > > > you > > > > > >> > know > > > > > >> > > >> if we > > > > > >> > > >> > > can > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > provide > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > Wyatt access for this? > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > From: Wyatt Barnett<mailto: > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > Sent: 11/14/2014 4:26 PM > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > To: [email protected]<mailto: > > > > > >> > > >> [email protected]> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > Subject: Re: Setting up the CI pipeline > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > I do a lot of CI and CD and I've got loads > > of > > > > seat > > > > > >> time > > > > > >> > > >> with > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > TeamCity, > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > I > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > would be happy to help the cause. > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Itamar > > > > > Syn-Hershko > > > > > >> < > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > [email protected]> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > Heya, > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > So JetBrains and CodeBetter have setup a > > > > > TeamCity > > > > > >> > > account > > > > > >> > > >> > for > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> us - > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://teamcity.codebetter.com/project.html?projectId=LuceneNet&tab=projectOverview > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > I have asked them to add Prescott and > Troy > > > as > > > > > >> > > >> collaborators, > > > > > >> > > >> > > so > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> we > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > 3 > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > have > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > access to change stuff there. > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > The idea is to have every sub-project > > (Core, > > > > > >> Codecs, > > > > > >> > > >> > Queries, > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > Facets, > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > etc) > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > compile and available as a nuget > package, > > > and > > > > > also > > > > > >> > > >> > thoroughly > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > tested > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > via > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > the test agents on TeamCity. > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > Prescott, Troy - you said you can work > on > > > > > setting > > > > > >> > this > > > > > >> > > >> up, > > > > > >> > > >> > > will > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> be > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > happy > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > for you to go ahead and do this now. > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > If there's anyone else on this list who > > has > > > > > >> > experience > > > > > >> > > >> with > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > TeamCity > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > and > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > setting up CI pipelines, please drop us > a > > > line > > > > > if > > > > > >> you > > > > > >> > > are > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> willing > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > to > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > help > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > with this effort. > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > -- > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko < > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> https://twitter.com/synhershko> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action < > > > > > >> > > >> http://manning.com/synhershko/ > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
