PR merged, but not visible on github due to sync issues --
Itamar Syn-Hershko http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> Freelance Developer & Consultant Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Paul Irwin <[email protected]> wrote: > https://github.com/apache/lucene.net/pull/25 > > PR created for a number of fixes, including the Timeout attribute from > Wyatt. I found a number of things that were causing tests to run forever. > In particular, the use of DateTime.Now.Millisecond is incorrect and still > exists in places -- I've been changing this to use DateTime comparisons > instead. > > > Paul Irwin > Lead Software Engineer > feature[23] > > Email: [email protected] > Cell: 863-698-9294 > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Paul Irwin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > For now I'm going to change the #if DEBUG call to be #if > > VERBOSE_TEST_LOGGING so that you must opt-in to this painfully excessive > > logging. I'll send a PR soon, with a few other things I found that are > > causing tests to spin. > > > > > > Paul Irwin > > Lead Software Engineer > > feature[23] > > > > Email: [email protected] > > Cell: 863-698-9294 > > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Yes - so if Wyatt can sort this out for us in a configurable way I'm > >> personally going to buy him beers > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/> > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Paul Irwin <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > I think that would be a good idea for very useful logs - but in this > >> case, > >> > the logs only appear to be useful if you're diagnosing an issue. It > >> would > >> > be too verbose to log for every single CI test run (probably talking > in > >> the > >> > MBs of logs just for this one test). > >> > > >> > > >> > Paul Irwin > >> > Lead Software Engineer > >> > feature[23] > >> > > >> > Email: [email protected] > >> > Cell: 863-698-9294 > >> > > >> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko < > [email protected] > >> > > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Better yet, how about: > >> > > > >> > > 1. Replacing all Console.WriteLine with logger.WriteLine - but set > it > >> up > >> > so > >> > > output does show up on TeamCity's output AND VisualStudio's Output > >> > window? > >> > > this way we can get far better logs on demand. > >> > > > >> > > 2. In the CI server, have the VERBOSE and DEBUG settings tunable for > >> when > >> > > we do want to run tests and get the logs for further inspections > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > > >> > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > >> > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > >> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant > >> > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/> > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Paul Irwin <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > I think I found the issue with the tests taking forever to run. > >> > > > TestDoubleMockGraphTokenFilterRandom was running seemingly > >> indefinitely > >> > > -- > >> > > > I don't actually think now that it would run indefinitely, I just > >> > didn't > >> > > > feel like waiting on it after a good number of minutes. > >> > > > > >> > > > I noticed a strange behavior when I was stepping through the test > to > >> > see > >> > > > what was going on -- the console output would catch up every few > >> times > >> > > I'd > >> > > > step over a statement, as if there were a background thread going > >> on. > >> > > > > >> > > > I do think there is some background thread issue, but it isn't > with > >> the > >> > > > Lucene.net code (as far as I can tell) -- it appears to be with > >> NUnit > >> > > > itself or perhaps the VS test framework. But since it happened on > >> the > >> > CI > >> > > > server too, I'm leaning towards NUnit. > >> > > > > >> > > > What I actually think is happening is that the Console output is > >> > handled > >> > > > asynchronously in some background thread, and there's just *so > much* > >> > > > logging > >> > > > happening in the LookaheadTokenFilter et al that when DEBUG > >> evaluates > >> > to > >> > > > true and the Console.WriteLine calls stack up, it takes forever to > >> get > >> > > > through them all. Running the tests in Release mode (when the > >> > > > Console.WriteLine is not called) or manually setting DEBUG and > >> VERBOSE > >> > to > >> > > > evaluate to false even in Debug configuration, causes the test to > >> pass > >> > in > >> > > > 15 seconds on my machine. > >> > > > > >> > > > Wyatt, can you try running the build and tests in Release mode and > >> see > >> > if > >> > > > it runs better for you? We might also be able to get through this > by > >> > > > reducing the logging by commenting out the Console.WriteLine > calls. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Paul Irwin > >> > > > Lead Software Engineer > >> > > > feature[23] > >> > > > > >> > > > Email: [email protected] > >> > > > Cell: 863-698-9294 > >> > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko < > >> > [email protected]> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Please do. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Send a ICLA to secretary@apache and send us a PR, I'll take > care > >> of > >> > > > > merging > >> > > > > it > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks! > >> > > > > > >> > > > > -- > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > >> > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko < > https://twitter.com/synhershko> > >> > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant > >> > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Wyatt Barnett < > >> > > [email protected]> > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > So, after fighting a number of teething problems -- many of > them > >> > self > >> > > > > > inflicted -- I've got a solid, repeatable test run that > >> finishes in > >> > > 38 > >> > > > > > minutes or so on our hardware. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > I can certainly reprise this setup over on > >> teamcity.codebetter.com > >> > > > > without > >> > > > > > much effort. We will need to merge some changes into things > >> before > >> > > > > > proceeding -- the current state of tests in the trunk will > just > >> > hang > >> > > if > >> > > > > we > >> > > > > > tried to run them there. I'm guessing I'll need to sign a > >> > > contributing > >> > > > > > agreement here as I don't believe I filed one. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Wyatt Barnett < > >> > > > [email protected]> > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Sounds good, we'll be [Explicit()] with reason. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko < > >> > > > > [email protected]> > >> > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Yes, but Explicit() will help us isolate those issues from > >> other > >> > > > real > >> > > > > > bugs > >> > > > > > >> we can concentrate on solving in parallel. > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> -- > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko > >> > > > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko < > >> > https://twitter.com/synhershko> > >> > > > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant > >> > > > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action < > http://manning.com/synhershko/> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Wyatt Barnett < > >> > > > > > [email protected]> > >> > > > > > >> wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > [Ignore()] is good too, I actually prefer a slightly > >> nuanced > >> > > > version > >> > > > > > >> called > >> > > > > > >> > [Explicit()] as that lets you still fire off the test > from > >> > > > resharper > >> > > > > > or > >> > > > > > >> > nunit gui. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > That said I proposed Assert.Fail() here because we can > put > >> the > >> > > > > failure > >> > > > > > >> > point at the *exact* point where the folks should start > >> > > debugging > >> > > > > this > >> > > > > > >> from > >> > > > > > >> > versus having them start a at a whole test or test > fixture. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko < > >> > > > > > [email protected] > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > Don't forget to stick a reason to the Ignore property > >> tho! > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > -- > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > >> > > > > > >> > > http://code972.com | @synhershko < > >> > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko> > >> > > > > > >> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant > >> > > > > > >> > > Author of RavenDB in Action < > >> http://manning.com/synhershko/ > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko < > >> > > > > > >> [email protected] > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Or just Skip (or Ignore, however that's called in > >> NUnit) > >> > :) > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > >> > > > > > >> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko < > >> > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko> > >> > > > > > >> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant > >> > > > > > >> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action < > >> > http://manning.com/synhershko/ > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Wyatt Barnett < > >> > > > > > >> > [email protected] > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> 5 minutes sounds like a reasonable going in > >> proposition. > >> > > That > >> > > > > > said > >> > > > > > >> > > >> depending on how many of these there are there might > >> well > >> > > be > >> > > > a > >> > > > > > >> *lot* > >> > > > > > >> > of > >> > > > > > >> > > 5 > >> > > > > > >> > > >> minute waits. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> Would it help if I just stuck Assert.Fails() where I > >> run > >> > > into > >> > > > > > these > >> > > > > > >> > > loops > >> > > > > > >> > > >> for the folks smarter than I to run down? > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko > < > >> > > > > > >> > [email protected] > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > 5 mins max for one test maybe? > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > To fix that infinite loop we need to revisit the > >> > original > >> > > > > Java > >> > > > > > >> code, > >> > > > > > >> > > >> most > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > likely its porting of an iterator-style code that > >> went > >> > > > > wrong. I > >> > > > > > >> hope > >> > > > > > >> > > to > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > have time to look at it next week, please anyone > >> else > >> > who > >> > > > > feels > >> > > > > > >> like > >> > > > > > >> > > it > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > beat me to it.. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > Itamar Syn-Hershko > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > http://code972.com | @synhershko < > >> > > > > > https://twitter.com/synhershko > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > Freelance Developer & Consultant > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > Author of RavenDB in Action < > >> > > > http://manning.com/synhershko/> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Wyatt Barnett < > >> > > > > > >> > > >> [email protected]> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > So, after the 2nd day of watching the tests just > >> > spin I > >> > > > > > decided > >> > > > > > >> > > that a > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > little visibility might make sense as something > >> just > >> > > was > >> > > > > not > >> > > > > > >> > adding > >> > > > > > >> > > up > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > -- I > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > expected some failing tests, and some > long-running > >> > > tests > >> > > > > but > >> > > > > > >> there > >> > > > > > >> > > >> just > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > ain't enough data here to keep something running > >> for > >> > 8+ > >> > > > > > hours. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > Anyhow, I stood up VS and the debugger and > started > >> > > > looking > >> > > > > > into > >> > > > > > >> > > things > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > and > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > I found that I was hitting at least one infiinte > >> loop > >> > > > > dealing > >> > > > > > >> with > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > randomized values -- specifically at > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/lucene.net/blob/master/src/Lucene.Net.TestFramework/Index/BasePostingsFormatTestCase.cs#L394 > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > ; > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > Anyhow, I'm not sure how to proceed here as if > we > >> > want > >> > > > test > >> > > > > > >> > > automation > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > the > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > tests need to run through in a reasonable amount > >> of > >> > > time > >> > > > > but > >> > > > > > I > >> > > > > > >> > don't > >> > > > > > >> > > >> know > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > enough about the project to know what should run > >> or > >> > > not. > >> > > > > One > >> > > > > > >> > thought > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > would > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > be to use nunit timeout attributes ( > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > http://www.nunit.org/index.php?p=timeout&r=2.5) > >> to > >> > > > > constrain > >> > > > > > >> > > things. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> If > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > so > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > what is a reasonable timeout? > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > I'm quite open to other, non kludgy thoughts too > >> . . > >> > . > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Wyatt Barnett > < > >> > > > > > >> > > >> [email protected] > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > I looked over GitVersion -- looks like a great > >> fit > >> > > for > >> > > > > this > >> > > > > > >> > > project > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > though > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > it will require a bit of forethought about > >> > branching > >> > > > > > >> strategies. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > I'll take a run at getting it integrated once > I > >> get > >> > > > > through > >> > > > > > >> the > >> > > > > > >> > > test > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > suite > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > running successfully. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Itamar > >> > Syn-Hershko > >> > > < > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > [email protected] > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Inline > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko < > >> > > > > > >> > https://twitter.com/synhershko > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action < > >> > > > > > http://manning.com/synhershko/ > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Wyatt > Barnett > >> < > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > [email protected] > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > Thanks. I registered at CodeBetter.com > under > >> > wwb. > >> > > Is > >> > > > > > there > >> > > > > > >> > any > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > documentation on their TeamCity setup or > >> someone > >> > > > who I > >> > > > > > can > >> > > > > > >> > > reach > >> > > > > > >> > > >> out > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > to > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > regarding questions about the build > >> environment? > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> I'm asking around, will let you know > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > Thanks for the rundown -- things sound > pretty > >> > > > > > >> straightforward > >> > > > > > >> > > and > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> doable. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > One thing we'll need to think a bit a bout > is > >> > how > >> > > do > >> > > > > we > >> > > > > > >> want > >> > > > > > >> > to > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > manage > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> the > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > git branching strategy to best integrate > with > >> > > > TeamCity > >> > > > > > and > >> > > > > > >> > best > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > automate > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > the release cycle. Doing things like > >> constantly > >> > > > > > building a > >> > > > > > >> > > >> "trunk" > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > and > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > releasing based on tags are very doable. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Are you familiar with > >> > > > > > >> > > https://github.com/ParticularLabs/GitVersion > >> > > > > > >> > > >> ? > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > I'll > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> be interested in adopting this to our > process. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > I've grabbed the code, looks like things > are > >> > > pretty > >> > > > > > clean > >> > > > > > >> in > >> > > > > > >> > > >> terms > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > of > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> being > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > able to build and run cleanly. One question > >> -- > >> > I > >> > > > > > started > >> > > > > > >> > > running > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > the > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> test > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > suite, it appears to execute about 80% > >> > > successfully. > >> > > > > I'm > >> > > > > > >> > > >> presuming > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > this > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> is > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > because we are still porting 4.8.0 here and > >> is > >> > > > > expected > >> > > > > > >> > > behavior. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > Please > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > confirm. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Yes, we still have some failing tests. The > >> hope is > >> > > to > >> > > > > also > >> > > > > > >> > > utilize > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> TeamCity's reports to measure the affects of > >> > > internal > >> > > > > > >> changes > >> > > > > > >> > we > >> > > > > > >> > > >> make > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> faster. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > I'll take a few stabs at a build cycle over > >> the > >> > > next > >> > > > > few > >> > > > > > >> days > >> > > > > > >> > > and > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > see > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> what > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > I can shake out. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks! > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Itamar > >> > > > Syn-Hershko < > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> [email protected]> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Thanks Wyatt > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Can you please register at > >> > > > > > >> http://teamcity.codebetter.com/ > >> > > > > > >> > > and > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > send > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> me > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > your > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > user name (privately if you prefer)? > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Please use the master branch of our > Apache > >> git > >> > > > > git:// > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > git.apache.org/lucene.net.git - or the > >> mirror > >> > > at > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > https://github.com/apache/lucene.net > >> (would > >> > > > rather > >> > > > > > you > >> > > > > > >> use > >> > > > > > >> > > the > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> original > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > one > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > to avoid delays) > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > The way I see it is this: > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Lucene.Net.TestFramework compiles and > >> > > generates > >> > > > a > >> > > > > > >> nuget > >> > > > > > >> > > >> package > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Lucene.Net.Core and Lucene.Net.Tests > >> > compiles, > >> > > > > > taking > >> > > > > > >> > > >> dependency > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > on > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Lucene.Net.TestFramework > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Lucene.Net.Tests is run and if > successful > >> > > > versions > >> > > > > > the > >> > > > > > >> > > build > >> > > > > > >> > > >> and > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > generates nuget on the local feed (we > also > >> > have > >> > > a > >> > > > > > MyGet > >> > > > > > >> > > >> account to > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> work > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > with) > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Same process to all sub-projects: > >> > > > > Lucene.Net.Queries > >> > > > > > >> for > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > example: > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Compile > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Compile Lucene.Net.Tests.Queries > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Run tests from > Lucene.Net.Tests.Queries > >> > > (take > >> > > > > > >> > dependency > >> > > > > > >> > > on > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Lucene.Net.TestFramework) > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Create nuget for Lucene.Net.Queries > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > * Every sub-project should be re-compiled > >> and > >> > > > tests > >> > > > > > >> re-run > >> > > > > > >> > if > >> > > > > > >> > > >> the > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > projects > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > it depends on have changed (you can > >> probably > >> > > > > separate > >> > > > > > >> the > >> > > > > > >> > > >> cases by > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > defining > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > watch folders under src\) > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > We can then iterate from there. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > I updated the README to explain the new > >> > > structure > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene.net/blob/master/README.md#files > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > - > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> let > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > me > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > know if you have any questions. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > http://code972.com | @synhershko < > >> > > > > > >> > > >> https://twitter.com/synhershko> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Author of RavenDB in Action < > >> > > > > > >> > http://manning.com/synhershko/> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Wyatt > >> > Barnett < > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> [email protected]> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > That would be great -- let me know > what I > >> > need > >> > > > to > >> > > > > do > >> > > > > > >> to > >> > > > > > >> > > help > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > make > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> that > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > happen. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > In the meantime I've got a teamcity > >> server > >> > to > >> > > > work > >> > > > > > >> with > >> > > > > > >> > > here, > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> should I > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > be > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > looking at > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > https://github.com/synhershko/lucene.net/tree/Lucene.Net_4.8.0 > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > as the project layout. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Also, what is envisioned for the output > >> of > >> > the > >> > > > > build > >> > > > > > >> > > >> pipeline? > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > Many > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > things > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > are within the art of the possible. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:08 PM, > Prescott > >> > > > Nasser < > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > [email protected]> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > Would love the help setting this up - > >> > Itamar > >> > > > do > >> > > > > > you > >> > > > > > >> > know > >> > > > > > >> > > >> if we > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > can > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > provide > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > Wyatt access for this? > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > ________________________________ > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > From: Wyatt Barnett<mailto: > >> > > > > > [email protected]> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > Sent: 11/14/2014 4:26 PM > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > To: [email protected]<mailto: > >> > > > > > >> > > >> [email protected]> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > Subject: Re: Setting up the CI > pipeline > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > I do a lot of CI and CD and I've got > >> loads > >> > > of > >> > > > > seat > >> > > > > > >> time > >> > > > > > >> > > >> with > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > TeamCity, > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > I > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > would be happy to help the cause. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:49 AM, > Itamar > >> > > > > > Syn-Hershko > >> > > > > > >> < > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > [email protected]> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > Heya, > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > So JetBrains and CodeBetter have > >> setup a > >> > > > > > TeamCity > >> > > > > > >> > > account > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > for > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> us - > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > http://teamcity.codebetter.com/project.html?projectId=LuceneNet&tab=projectOverview > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > I have asked them to add Prescott > and > >> > Troy > >> > > > as > >> > > > > > >> > > >> collaborators, > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > so > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> we > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > 3 > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > have > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > access to change stuff there. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > The idea is to have every > sub-project > >> > > (Core, > >> > > > > > >> Codecs, > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > Queries, > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > Facets, > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > etc) > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > compile and available as a nuget > >> > package, > >> > > > and > >> > > > > > also > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > thoroughly > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > tested > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > via > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > the test agents on TeamCity. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > Prescott, Troy - you said you can > >> work > >> > on > >> > > > > > setting > >> > > > > > >> > this > >> > > > > > >> > > >> up, > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > will > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> be > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > happy > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > for you to go ahead and do this > now. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > If there's anyone else on this list > >> who > >> > > has > >> > > > > > >> > experience > >> > > > > > >> > > >> with > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > TeamCity > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > and > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > setting up CI pipelines, please > drop > >> us > >> > a > >> > > > line > >> > > > > > if > >> > > > > > >> you > >> > > > > > >> > > are > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> willing > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > to > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > help > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > with this effort. > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > Cheers, > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko < > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> https://twitter.com/synhershko> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > Author of RavenDB in Action < > >> > > > > > >> > > >> http://manning.com/synhershko/ > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >
