There are those in the community that disagree with that approach though, so it isn't obvious to some. Just trying to clarify and determine if that is our project's stance.
Paul Irwin Lead Software Engineer feature[23] Email: [email protected] Cell: 863-698-9294 On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <[email protected]> wrote: > Obviously > > -- > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > Freelance Developer & Consultant > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/> > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Paul Irwin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Agreed with using Nuget as much as possible. I also prefer not to commit > > binaries (like the packages folder) into the repo to reduce bloat. Yes, > it > > requires internet access to pull down the latest packages, but that beats > > having a gigantic repo to clone. > > > > > > Paul Irwin > > Lead Software Engineer > > feature[23] > > > > Email: [email protected] > > Cell: 863-698-9294 > > > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > No, on the master branch we will be using nuget as much as we can. If > you > > > can bring Antlr with nuget please do so. > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/> > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Hakeem Mohammed <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > So all 3rd party dlls go under a subfolder under lib and actual nuget > > > pkgs > > > > are not used. Is that correct? > > > > > > > > Apologies if this has been addressed before, I'm new to the group > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > >
