It actually has, and I maintain it. There is currently an issue with strong naming with a dependency of S4n that I need to solve..
-- Itamar Syn-Hershko http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> Freelance Developer & Consultant Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Hakeem Mohammed <[email protected]> wrote: > The only add'l lib that I see in the lib folder is Spatial4n. I'm assuming > it didn't have a nuget pkg. haven't checked though > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > That, and also we can mirror things on MyGet in the worst case. I have > > already set up a feed for us there that we will use for publishing beta > > packages. > > > > -- > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > > Freelance Developer & Consultant > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/> > > > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Rob Vesse <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Note that there is nothing stopping anyone packaging up an arbitrary > DLL > > > into a NuGet package and publishing it themselves if that is what is > > > necessary to get an all NuGet build. I've done this myself in the past > > > for some of the more obscure dependencies I've needed in projects. > > > > > > However if you are using a dependency that isn't on NuGet these days > that > > > probably begs the question about whether said dependency is abandon > ware > > > and should be removed/replaced > > > > > > Rob > > > > > > On 06/01/2015 16:26, "Wyatt Barnett" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >I'm one of those who disagrees -- at least at this scale. We have > very, > > > >relatively small few dependencies here that are quite stable. They > have > > > >been in the git repo at some point so we are already paying freight. > > > > > > > >Personally I'd prefer the safer route of having the binaries locally > and > > > >not depending on nuget being up and nuget keeping whatever old > > > >dependencies > > > >we might have avaliable -- there is no SLA there that I'm aware of on > > that > > > >side of the world and I'm not sure what recourse we would have if > there > > > >were. > > > > > > > >That said it does appear nuget restore has been working well so I > don't > > > >see > > > >why we can't proceed down this path. > > > > > > > >On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Paul Irwin <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> There are those in the community that disagree with that approach > > > >>though, > > > >> so it isn't obvious to some. Just trying to clarify and determine if > > > >>that > > > >> is our project's stance. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Paul Irwin > > > >> Lead Software Engineer > > > >> feature[23] > > > >> > > > >> Email: [email protected] > > > >> Cell: 863-698-9294 > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Obviously > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > > > > >> > Itamar Syn-Hershko > > > >> > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > > > >> > Freelance Developer & Consultant > > > >> > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/> > > > >> > > > > >> > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Paul Irwin <[email protected]> > > > >>wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > Agreed with using Nuget as much as possible. I also prefer not > to > > > >> commit > > > >> > > binaries (like the packages folder) into the repo to reduce > bloat. > > > >>Yes, > > > >> > it > > > >> > > requires internet access to pull down the latest packages, but > > that > > > >> beats > > > >> > > having a gigantic repo to clone. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Paul Irwin > > > >> > > Lead Software Engineer > > > >> > > feature[23] > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Email: [email protected] > > > >> > > Cell: 863-698-9294 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko > > > >><[email protected] > > > >> > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > No, on the master branch we will be using nuget as much as we > > > >>can. If > > > >> > you > > > >> > > > can bring Antlr with nuget please do so. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > -- > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > > > >> > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko < > > https://twitter.com/synhershko> > > > >> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant > > > >> > > > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Hakeem Mohammed < > > > >> [email protected]> > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > So all 3rd party dlls go under a subfolder under lib and > > actual > > > >> nuget > > > >> > > > pkgs > > > >> > > > > are not used. Is that correct? > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Apologies if this has been addressed before, I'm new to the > > > >>group > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks! > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
