Hi, I imagine that the Reports page in the wiki-page is relevant. I'm not sure what "located in foundation/board/" refers to.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Reports // Simon Svensson On 2019-01-17 13:24, Laimonas Simutis wrote: > Shannon, > > Perhaps that should be our goal, to get the updated website out while > indicating there that 4.8 is in beta state. Seems like you put in a good > amount of work and close(?) to the finish line. If you don't mind, you > could be the next link that keeps this project active until Shad or > somebody else gets back in :) > > Could this we be our report: > > - stats from NuGet showing the numbers of downloads and how much newest 4.8 > is being fetched? > - link to the new website docs and that we will work on getting that > deployed > - explain that the previous PMC member that delivered the reports became > unavailable, something like that? > > Prescott, what does it take to deliver the report to the board? > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 3:08 AM Prescott Nasser <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I have been dis-engaged since stepping down as PMC Chair... the board is >> absolutely casting a wide net to see if there is any activity present. >> >> We had teamcity for open source set up at one time - >> http://teamcity.codebetter.com/viewLog.html?buildId=177083&; - a link I >> pulled out of some old emails, but there have been changes to teamcity >> infrastructure and I don't know if that integration still lives or how it >> works anymore. I think Wyatt Barnett set it up... if you're still lurking >> Wyatt.. >> >> Those websites do look great, I wish we got them live >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Simon Svensson <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 12:43 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Anybody home? >> >> Hi, >> >> I think that the new website looks awesome. >> >> I'm unsure about cc'ing the board; mostly because I am a lurker without >> that much experience of the Apache way. I was also a bit surprised to see >> that original message in dev@, but it could just been a wide net to try >> and contact anyone. (It was also sent to private@.) >> >> I totally agree with you, Shannon, about the "problems with this project >> is not knowing where to start, what needs to be done, etc..." >> >> Regarding the unit tests; several of them fail for me. It took me a while >> to figure out that I need to run the tests in release mode (not debug >> mode), but there are still some failing tests. There's also a setting in >> Resharper (under Tools > Unit Testing > General) that allows me to skip >> tests in the LongRunningTest category. >> >> Some fails because of a hardcoded `fail("LUCENENET TODO: Uncaught >> exceptions on background thread causing test runner crash");` which is >> wrapped in a `#IF NETCOREAPP2_0`, but I do not know how to run the tests as >> something else. Is there another build configuration than the one available >> per default in Visual Studio? Or are these tests that needs to be fixed? >> There are some other failures for me too, and I'll see if I can start >> looking into them. >> >> Is there a CI server somewhere that runs the tests in different >> configurations and can give us reports on how it's going? >> >> // Simon Svensson >> >> On 2019-01-17 00:36, Shannon Deminick wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Last year I had worked on getting the docs website generated for 4.8 >>> along with a new shiny website for the Lucene.Net project. Both are >>> mostly done but Shad seems to have disappeared and I'm unsure how to >>> get access to push some of these things. >>> >>> I think one of the biggest problems with this project is not knowing >>> where to start, what needs to be done, etc... there's a barrier to >>> entry unless you've been heavily involved with this project already. A >>> lot of this information is buried in these email lists or on some >>> hidden page of a wiki somewhere. >>> >>> Here was the new website format: >>> https://lucenenetsite.azurewebsites.net/ >>> and the new docs format: https://lucenenetdocs.azurewebsites.net/ >>> >>> They are not 100% done but not far too go. I do want to keep working >>> on these and get them live (time isn't on my side recently though). >>> The PR for this work is here >>> https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/206 and the remaining work is >>> really getting the download page to use the CGI page with checksums >>> (would need the source for that current page >>> https://lucenenet.apache.org/download.cgi) , to update the >>> Contribution page to clearly state what remaining work there is on 4.8 >>> and a link to the old (current) website. >>> >>> I'd be happy to send the reports needed to apache but don't entirely >>> know what needs to be done there. Also the Rich Bowen above mentions >>> that we should be cc'ing [email protected] on this discussion? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 9:58 AM Laimonas Simutis <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>>> oops, sent too early, to finish my side note: >>>> >>>> If you want to attempt to contribute, you could try >>>> >>>> - pull source from https://github.com/apache/lucenenet >>>> - run tests, (they should be all passing) >>>> - check out https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LUCENENET/issues, >>>> perhaps some would be of interest to you >>>> >>>> I have the ability to merge the pull requests but would hesitate to >>>> get involved unless there is another committer available to bounce >>>> ideas and run things. Or if Shad is still on, maybe Shad can provide >> guidance. >>>> >>>> Laimonas >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 4:47 PM Laimonas Simutis <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Simon, >>>>> >>>>> Lurker here, just like you! The last I recall the state of the >>>>> project >>>> was: >>>>> >>>>> - Shad was doing beta builds and gearing up for the official release >>>>> of >>>> 4.8 >>>>> - There seemed to be bugs reported on the 4.8 and he was just >>>>> working on those and doing the follow-up beta builds >>>>> >>>>> I contributed regularly over two years ago to get the bugs out of >>>>> the core and then other things came up. Sometime later Shad took >>>>> over and >>>> made >>>>> great progress but has dropped off since summer. >>>>> >>>>> I could find time to contribute I think, but not convinced it is >>>>> worth >>>> the >>>>> time investment. Will it truly matter if this project goes away? >>>>> Seems >>>> like >>>>> a few of us here have warm feelings towards lucene.net for several >>>>> reasons but outside of that ... not so sure. >>>>> >>>>> The community seems to be happily pulling in 3.0.3 builds and moving >> on. >>>>> To me, that means that wherever Lucene.net is used, it's some older >>>>> projects? If you are doing something new in .net you are most likely >>>> going >>>>> with .net core and you couldn't use 3.0.3 there. >>>>> >>>>> Would be cool to see this survive and go on, but is it worth it? >>>>> That's the question that sort of leads me to not doing anything :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Side note: >>>>> >>>>> For those that want to attempt to contribute, pulling from >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Laimonas >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:21 PM Simon Svensson <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I've been lurking for a long time, but hadn't realized that the >>>>>> situation was this far gone. So much for situational awareness... >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll be clear and state that I'm more of a Lucene.Net user, rather >>>>>> than a core developer, and I'm not that knowledgeable of the inner >>>>>> workings of Lucene.Net. >>>>>> >>>>>> What is the current state of the 4.8 port? I understand that the >>>>>> coding has stopped for various reason, but is there any wiki or >>>>>> documentation available for the current state of affairs? Even if I >>>>>> were to dedicate some hours of the week to Lucene.Net, I wouldn't >>>>>> know where to start. Is it enough to run the test fixtures and check >> for failures? >>>>>> >>>>>> A year ago there was some discussions about barriers to entry. I >>>>>> think that a "mentor" role where someone points at things to work >>>>>> on would help in getting people started. >>>>>> >>>>>> I also feel that I am not the right guy to submit a report to anyone. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, I bet there's more lurkers than me here. Come out of the >>>>>> shadows, now's the time to assemble! ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> // Simon Svensson >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2019-01-16 18:15, Rich Bowen wrote: >>>>>>> Once again, we're attempting to discover if anybody is at home on >>>>>>> this >>>>>> project. You've missed your reports for September, October, >>>>>> November, December, and now January as well. If we don't hear from >>>>>> you, we will be forced to move you to the attic. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please respond, immediately, copying [email protected] on your >>>>>> response, to tell us what's going on with you folks. Thanks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --Rich Bowen, for the Board of Directors [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
