Hi, That TeamCity page really helps in getting an overview what currently fails. It's a bit weird that a build with failing tests get a green checkmark, but I've done PHP for the last few years so "a bit weird" is my new black.
I've sent a PR on GitHub for two of the failing tests on .NET Standard 2.0 (which will probably also fix things in .NET Framework 4.5.1). I'm focusing on .NET Standard 2.0 because that's what I ended up with when I used Resharper's test runner in Visual Studio 2017. How do people execute the tests locally for other targets? Ref: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/218 I'll look into the other failing tests for .NET Standard 2.0 during the day. There's some failing tests regarding the ICU, but I have a weird feeling in the back of my head that the ICU has been the focus for a lot of discussions and there was some porting work, or something, going on here. Anyone know what the state of the ICU stuff is? // Simon Svensson On 2019-01-18 00:30, Shannon Deminick wrote: > Thanks Laimonas! > > As for a build server, this is the one that Shad pointed me to > https://teamcity.jetbrains.com/project.html?projectId=LuceneNet_PortableBuilds&tab=projectOverview > > (which is another link to setup on the website so people know where it is) > > I'll send a separate email out about remaining effort on the website, > etc... > > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 5:11 AM Laimonas Simutis <[email protected]> wrote: > >> We are still here and trying to see what it will take to regroup and get >> the activity going. It's been silent but Lucene.net activity is still there >> and we are incredibly close to having 4.8 finished. >> >> Here are the steps we are discussing: >> >> - what's left to release the updated website that has 4.8 info as well as >> an updated look. New site might help to attract more contributors as well >> as provide more up to date information >> - review of nuget stats, the 4.8 beta 5 has ~10k downloads in the last six >> weeks >> - reviewing JIRA issues filed against 4.8 beta to see if there are any >> critical issues that need to be addressed for the final release >> - discussing who is around to help to contribute, so far we have seven >> responders (since yesterday). >> >> Our best case scenario is that we will deliver the report this February and >> make progress with the deployment of the new website. >> >> >> Laimonas >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 11:15 AM Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Once again, we're attempting to discover if anybody is at home on this >>> project. You've missed your reports for September, October, November, >>> December, and now January as well. If we don't hear from you, we will be >>> forced to move you to the attic. >>> >>> Please respond, immediately, copying [email protected] on your response, >>> to tell us what's going on with you folks. Thanks. >>> >>> --Rich Bowen, for the Board of Directors >>> [email protected] >>> >>> >> >
