NightOwl888 commented on issue #763: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/issues/763#issuecomment-1319069514
This is an exact duplicate of #485. While we do have a little better handle on locking contention since then, there are still known concurrency issues to track down in `Lucene.Net.Facet` and in the dictionary-based `BreakIterator` in [ICU4N](https://github.com/NightOwl888/ICU4N) (See #269). However, our goal of upgrading to a newer version of Lucene when the port is completed has not changed, and not only is this not part of that planned work but it is also something that could potentially slow down the upgrade process. Given the choice between async/await support and the latest Lucene features, I suspect most people would rather have the latter. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucenenet.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
