NightOwl888 commented on issue #763:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/issues/763#issuecomment-1319142053

   Well, being that we just started our 9th year porting Lucene 4.8.0, this 
isn't a priority.
   
   I still stand by what was said last year. The Lucene team is the place to 
submit this request. Let them work out at a high level how to make async/await 
work with the design. Then when we port the next version it will automatically 
be part of our TODO list, rather than something that is going to sidetrack us.
   
   It might help to be very specific about which APIs need to be async. If you 
can narrow the focus it will be more likely something the Lucene team would 
consider doing.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucenenet.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to