eladmarg commented on issue #763: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/issues/763#issuecomment-1319683616
@tonyguo2022 this is really appreciated, but at this limits we cannot go behind the library frame (in the repo) because the main goal of this project was port from the java version. async / await is only one piece in a big puzzle. one option i can see is to optimize the port in another repository, but i doubt how many people will contribute, especially when this contribution for this port is very limited. (yes we're totally lucky we have @NightOwl888 who's willing to give his efforts and time. the downside that it won't be compatible to future upgrades. also, as we all know, lucene is very complex project. many of the design had big thoughts and the talented developers who want to get into it are very limited. let's hope in the future the library will be upgraded to match the java version and it will perform better. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucenenet.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
