Jeevananthan-23 commented on issue #793: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/issues/793#issuecomment-1793723296
> As for upgrading a single feature ahead of where it is in Lucene, this is where we run into problems. We have no idea before porting it what other patches it depends upon and whether any of those depend on binary formats that have changed. So we could start off porting to get the "future" feature in 4.8.0 only to find out later that it is incompatible and all of the work porting that one feature would go out the window. It would take much longer to port Lucene feature by feature than it would be to port the diff between 2 commits to get to a higher version. And we would always be sure to have a version that works (at least as well as it worked in Java). Indeed explanation, so when I was working on adding the **Sequence Number** feature found the same issue really **uncertain about the Lucnenet roadmap**. @NightOwl888/ @rclabo can anyone explain this to me open to contributions focusing on production-grade features. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucenenet.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
