paulirwin commented on issue #1062: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/issues/1062#issuecomment-2524854405
@NightOwl888 Thanks for that context. Looking at the changes to fix the performance issues you mention, it was a difference between having a lambda that captures and a string interpolation, which is quite different than the scenario here. When data in the surrounding scope is captured, here it's the difference between having a custom AnonymousClass that captures the data in a field, and for a lambda, that is generated by the compiler as a class that captures the field, so they should be about identical in terms of heap allocation and performance. The compiler might be able to apply greater optimizations to lambdas that do not capture. I'll benchmark to be sure though. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucenenet.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
