paulirwin commented on issue #1062: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/issues/1062#issuecomment-2525267423
@Shazwazza Thanks, I made the no-capture lambda case static and it was the same result, so I'm guessing .NET was already optimizing it that way. The others I can't make static because they capture, like you said. It would be nice if .NET somehow could optimize a non-static lambda to not be more costly than an object that implements a functional interface... Inspired by your comment about overloads, perhaps we could add overloads that take a delegate but then store it in a lucenenet-specific implementation of the interface that just calls the delegate, so that the underlying stored reference is the functional interface type instead of a delegate. This would probably be the best of both worlds: allow for ease of use in the API by passing a lambda if you're not concerned about a few ns/op or 64 extra bytes allocated, but allow for passing an object that implements the interface for more performance-critical scenarios. I'll experiment with this approach and see how it feels. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucenenet.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
