+1 I couldn't have said it better.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Peter Karman <[email protected]> wrote: > Marvin Humphrey wrote on 6/30/14 11:07 PM: > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Nick Wellnhofer <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I don't see much use in releasing Lucy 0.4 with an opaque version of > >> Clownfish. There aren't any major new features in the 0.4 release so > Lucy > >> users can stick with 0.3 as well. I'm more concerned with not delaying > the > >> Clownfish release any longer. > > > > It doesn't bother me in the slightest to make a release with no > significant > > visible features. > > > > In fact, I suggest that we start releasing on a fixed cadence at > one-month > > intervals as we roll out Clownfish. > > +1 > > I consider it part of the release-early/often philosophy to push releases > that > may only have changes in documentation or internal refactoring. It gives > the > testers something to chew on and helps keep development aligned with actual > users. Also (and often under-emphasized) the psychological effect of > seeing "and > yet another release of Whatever" reflects that the project is alive and > well and > Doing Stuff, even if that stuff is invisible to end-users. > > > -- > Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . [email protected] >
