On 01/07/2014 05:07, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Nick Wellnhofer <[email protected]> wrote:
You had voiced support for going from VTable to Class:
http://s.apache.org/yNW
By the way, I'm really in favor of renaming Clownfish::VTable to
Clownfish::Class.
So if you get to that before I do, great. Otherwise, I understand that I'm
the one blocking and it's my responsibility to make stuff happen.
Yes, I'd like to work on that.
Possible concerns:
* Some host languages provide a getClass() method, which we'll want to avoid
clashing with. So when we rename Obj#Get_VTable(), we'll need to name it
something like Get_CFClass().
I'd prefer to add a host method alias in this case.
* We can't name a struct member `class`[1]. We might go with either
`cfclass` or `klass` (both of which I'd prefer over `cls` or `clazz`).
I don't have a strong preference but we've been using "klass" in CFC anyway so
let's stick with that.
* My personal preference would be to have no `nickname` for Class, rather
than the unpronounceable `Cls`: Class_Get_Name(), Class_Make_Obj(), etc.
+1.
Nick
