On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Jake Mannix <[email protected]> wrote:
> The math (Colt) stuff is a special case, and in fact, is one which will > lull > us > into a sense of security by having warnings go away, because it's still way > low on test coverage. But, we did go an run my nice "auto-deprecator" > ruby script on it, so we at least still have those warnings... > It isn't just lack of test cases leading to deprecations. I had a use just now for some of the code and in the process of adding test cases to get rid of the deprecations found it wasn't quite right. If dipping into 4 routines uncovers 1 medium to minor bug, there must be quite a few more of those lurking. > *shrug* That code still has way more issues than just formatting, it's > done in an entirely different style, was aimed at compiling against, like > jdk1.2, and really needs some care and attention, and maybe possibly > even some *use* at some point! > Indeed.
