I wasn't here when you all picked up Colt, but I wonder if we want to pick a middle ground between carrying around @deprecated code that no one feels like testing and deleting it altogether. Work went into IP clearance and all that. I'd identifying the things that look furthest from useful and moving them to a separate 'attic', from which they could be recovered in case someone found a use for them.
By the way, howcome 'taste' has a BitSet distinct from either the JDK class or the collection BitVector? On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > I would agree mildly with 80% of the result, grump about 10% and tear hair > about 10%. I don't know which 10% at the moment. > > But it wouldn't hurt for one or more of us to go through and mark up a list > of things we can see a use for. > > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What would happen if I suggest we delete anything still deprecated? >
