On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: > I wasn't here when you all picked up Colt, but I wonder if we want to > pick a middle ground between carrying around @deprecated code that no > one feels like testing and deleting it altogether. Work went into IP > clearance and all that. I'd identifying the things that look furthest > from useful and moving them to a separate 'attic', from which they > could be recovered in case someone found a use for them.
(It is always resurrectable from SVN too.) > By the way, howcome 'taste' has a BitSet distinct from either the JDK > class or the collection BitVector? Purely for speed and size -- mostly skipping range checks, cutting out fields, etc. It mattered enough since it got used so much.
