I think that the "maven is the official arbiter" is correct, but I would find it very handy if we could share things like the IntelliJ code style profiles even if they aren't authoritative. My Mahout profile is definitely not quite correct. I am happy to refer to the Hudson builds as the definitive version, but would love to have a head-start on my IDE configs.
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > And there's a fifth set: my IntelliJ code inspection settings, which I > haven't checked in, but could. But then what about other IDE settings? > it keeps going... > > > Is it too aggressive to say we officially build and check-style with > Maven, checkstyle, findbugs (with configs in buildtools/), and > everything else is up to the user? I don't even know how many Eclipse > users there are out there versus IntelliJ and Other. > > > Tally up whatever we lose by deleting this versus the fact that right > now, to edit project-wide standards, I edit the same files in two > places (and had actually missed a set!) and am still failing to update > Eclipse-related settings since I don't use them. That strikes me as > bad. >
